- Quality paper for everyday photo prints
- Works with all major inkjet printers
- 8.5 by 11 inch size, 25-sheet pack
- Fast dry time
- Soft gloss finish
Some printer companies design their printers, ink and paper to work together. When this continuity is compromised, the output quality is often substandard.
In short, HP=ok. Other=**danger**
Buy Kodak 1124346 Picture Paper Now
I''ve been pretty happy with the results of this paper with my Epson R200 printer. Just the right touch of gloss as in matted texture.Read Best Reviews of Kodak 1124346 Picture Paper Here
I love this paper because its the only decent double sided semi-gloss paper that I have found to make family calendars. I know that this paper is no longer manufactured, but its a great paper and not too expensive if you can find it.Want Kodak 1124346 Picture Paper Discount?
The reality is different brand of printers likes certain brand of paper. The best result is to match the makers of the same printer and paper together. I used canon, epson, HP, and gneranic brand of paper. I find epson paper to be the most compatible photo paper overall, it prints well on Epson and Canon printers. Canon paper are good too and they print very well on their Canon printers. I used HP photo paper on Epson and Canon and the ink doesn''t dry/catch that well on either, it prints ok on its own HP.This Kodak works fine on my old Epson printer, and I have bought quite a few pack. Now that I am exclusive Canon printers (i950) this Kodak Photo paper is as bad as most generic paper out there. At least it dry, but the picture is not sharp. Generic papers are the worst for photo inkjet, one office brand didn''t even dry and bubble. I am not buying this paper again, I actually have a batch of Picture Paper from the 2002, they might have gotten better, but I doubt it.I use this paper for a number of the projects and I really love it. I get a good quality illustration print that is great for scrapbooking and card making. So I find it works just fine. I have had great results off of my canon printer. So, no complaints here. But I definitely wouldn''t use it for photography.
0 comments:
Post a Comment