Showing posts with label small laser printer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label small laser printer. Show all posts

Brother DR-620 Drum Unit Save 37% off

Brother DR-620 Drum Unit - Retail Packaging
  • Drum unit has Approx. Page Yield Based on 5% Coverage8.5" x 11" Paper of 25,000 pages

I''ve been buying Brother drum units from Amazon for 2 3 years now (run a home based accounting business so go through 2 3 drum units per year). They all work great and as advertised. Based on my experience 1) the warning message about low drum unit can last a long time so no need to replace until you get the "drum life end" message and it stops printing (but that''s why you need to have one on hand) and 2) when you do replace the drum unit you need to tell the MFC that you have installed a new drum unit (read the instructions) that resets all the messages, etc.

I used to buy from Office Max locally but the Amazon price is 2/3rds of Office Max and usually I get free shipping so no contest. I still buy case paper from Office Max(wait for sales) no Amazon advantage there.

My last Brother MFC I got 94,000 copies/prints before it started making "klacking" noises and giving lots of false paper jam messages. But that more than paid for itself over and over again. So I just purchased the MFC 8890DW (my third Brother MFC now), installed without a hitch and is my new "workhorse".

Buy Brother DR-620 Drum Unit Now

We received a "Low Drum Unit" warning, leading me to purchase a replacement unit. I decided to wait until the print-quality degraded before replacing the unit. It''s been 6 months of heavy use now, I just replaced the toner cartridge, and the print quality continues to be excellent.

I''m sure I will need this unit eventually, but I''m glad I didn''t put it in 6 months ago.

Read Best Reviews of Brother DR-620 Drum Unit Here

I can''t speak for the other comments, but the one I just order and received IS a Brother product. So, don''t be frightened off!

Want Brother DR-620 Drum Unit Discount?

I held off buying this for months because the description was ambiguous about whether it was Brother or brand-X. I even wrote Amazon support to ask (they were no help).

Now that the description is clearer (and in spite of the "not Brother" review), I ordered one 2/11. It is a (presumably) genuine Brother unit, in a sealed Brother box.

Save 37% off

Nothing flowery to say, its a printer drum. It arrived in the specified timeframe and it works! I''d order again.

Epson Stylus Photo 820 Inkjet Printer

Epson Stylus Photo 820 Inkjet Printer
  • Up to 2,880 x 720 dpi resolution
  • Uses 6-color quick-drying inks for smudge-free results
  • Supports border-free printing on letter-size paper
  • Prints up to 12 pages per minute in black, or a 4 x 6 inch photo in 48 seconds
  • Parallel and USB interfaces; PC and Mac compatible

The picture quality of the Epson 820 is pretty good even using the 720 DPI quality. I set my default to print at 720 DPI to save ink. I found the 2880 DPI quality is useless since at that DPI, my Epson Photo Paper curled due to over saturation of ink. 1440 DPI produced the best quality on standard Photo Paper, but the difference vs 720 DPI is marginal. I think if you purchase Epson''s super expensive ColorLife paper, then 2880 DPI would work. The PIM (print image matching) is just marketing. PIM doesn''t print the pictures any better. I found that PIM actually made my pictures (taken from my Sony Cybershot P-50) more dull. The Epson 820 drinks ink. I don''t know why Epson (other than to make more $$$) makes their color ink cartridge so thin and thus carrying less ink.

The Film Factory software that comes with the printer is exactly what I''ve been looking for in regards to printing common photo sizes such as 3x5, 4x6, 5x7, 8x10, or wallets. I can fit 4 3x5 or 2 4x6 into one sheet of photo paper which minimizes the cost of each photo sheet when calculated by per picture.

Overall, I rate this a 3.5 rounded up to 4.0 for Amazon''s scale. Picture quality is very good...rivals a real photo. In fact a friend of mine thought the Epson print was the real photo when comparing the same exact picture processed by Ofoto.com (an online Kodak processing company). Again, the Film Factory software is very good for printing common photo sizes. However, because of the rapid ink usage, I didn''t rate this a 5.0, which is the main draw back of this printer. ...

Buy Epson Stylus Photo 820 Inkjet Printer Now

I needed a better photo quality printer to supplement my HP 1120C. My application is for personal photo printer not as a production or office printer.

I researched all types of photo quality printers for several weeks and was going to go with the Cannon until I noticed how cheaply even the high end Canons were made. I also noticed that almost no one sold Cannon supplies like the required expensive Cannon paper. The Lexmark was far too expensive to own when it came to buying ink.

I was looking at some of the better Epson photo printers when I noticed that the lowly 820 used the exact same print cartridges. Then I realized Epson has just cut the price to a hundred dollars! Subtracting the value of the included ink that means the hardware is now only sixty dollars. At that price if the print head clogs I will throw it away. But I like this printer so much I may buy more of them. It is an incredible value at its new low price. First compared to Canons at twice the price it is `rugged''. The paper tray folds up when not in use, which serves a very practical purpose. It helps keep the dust out of the printer and dust is one of the causes of print head clogging. If you remember to ALWAYS turn this printer of using the left switch (GREEN LIGHT) and keep the tray closed you should not have many print head clogging problems. So far I haven''t had any problems.

Some try to get away with as few as three colors in their photo printers but the Epson 820 uses six colors and your eye can immediately see the difference. The Epson 820 produces prints like those from photo labs on high quality photo paper. The Epson 820 ink is rated to be light fast for 25 years, which is, long enough for me. My HP 1120C produces colors which start to fade within months if not days.

Now look at the cost of owning the Epson. One significant feature of the HP was it had a print preview in the printer driver. I could enable it to check exactly what would be printed so I could avoid wasting expensive ink. Darn if the Epson 820 doesn''t have the same the feature although implemented slightly differently. In some ways I like the Epson printer drivers better as there are so many options which enable me to get exactly what I want. Some people may be turned off by so many options but they don''t have to use them. Their prints will simply be more expensive than mine will be or of a slightly lesser quality compared to what the printer could have produced. The features are there if users would learn to use them, which is better than not having them at all.

I ran into a Canon salesman at MicroCenter when I bought the Epson 820. I told him he had five minutes to convince me the Canon 750 was a better value. His biggest claim was look at how you could replace each Canon cartridge individually, as not all colors would run out at the same time. Ok that is a nice feature but in real life the colors run out pretty close to each other. That means that if I replace one color I may find out that in the next picture I print I have run out of two more etc. I like being able to just swap out the empty set and be done with it. Five Canon color inks run about sixty dollars. You can buy three Epson 820 five color carts for that price and the ink will be fresher with less chance the pigments have separated from the binder. You don''t want to store ink to far into the future from its date of manufacture just like you would not want to buy paint for your house and keep it for years before you used it.

I have also noticed that there now are continuous ink feed systems and alternate sources of replacement cartridges for the 820 on the Internet but I am not too excited about them since I am not printing that many photos on a weekly basis. I would have guessed that such products would not exist because of the chip in each Epson cartridge that monitors ink flow and declare the cartridge to be empty when ink is low.

One application my brother in law has is to carry an ink jet with him in his truck to immediately print reports and photos he takes when inspecting houses. By buying a simple voltage inverter and using a laptop to drive the printer he can achieve that goal with a better quality print output using the Epson 820. Again the 820 printer is cheap enough that if it gets damaged he can toss it.

One other detail to examine. One doesn''t want to get a printer that will be orphaned since so little supplies are bought by the public it is uneconomical to carry them. Amazon rates the sales for each product. Look at how the Epson 820 rates compared to any other printer.

What are the cons to the Epson 820?

It is slower than the high end Canons in making a photo but it is hundreds of dollars cheaper.

It is nosier than my HP as it moves the paper back and forth but that is a photo it is working with and it doesn''t really bother me.

It has a non-replaceable print head compared to including the print head in each new cartridge like the HP does. This means it will eventually wear out. At sixty dollars net cost of hardware who cares? I don''t!

Do you? Epson will probably have another hundred dollar, six color photo printer with improved technology when I need to replace the print head in five years or 16,000 prints.

Read Best Reviews of Epson Stylus Photo 820 Inkjet Printer Here

I started with an HP 882C last year thinking that I had a printer that could print "photo quality." Unfortunately, it didn''t. After a year of dissappointment, I talked to my photographer brother after seeing some prints that I''d assumed had come from his office. Not so! He had used an Epson printer.

I didn''t want to buy one at first, because of all of the $$ I''d likely spend making prints. Well, it hasn''t been so bad. Unlike the other review here, I think that the cartridges are reasonable (compared to the HP that I had) and the paper is reasonable for the quality.

With other brands, paying more means better quality images. However, with Epson, paying more means faster printing speeds. This printer is basically at the bottom of the Epson line, with great quality, especially with the best papers. The black and white is crisp and clean.

Get ready though, because the prining is SLOW! That goes for color, photo, B&W print, all of it! Anything that''s not draft quality is slow, slow, slow!

If you are getting ready to make a purchase, check to see how much money you have, then compare to how much time you have. I have left the printer to print out a two page resume, 25 copies, for a total of 50 pages. It''s been quite a while...longer than an hour! That''s the only reason it doesn''t get 5 stars.

However, if you have other things to do, and a negative scanner or a high quality digital camera, this could be just the thing for you. Made plenty of Christmas presents this year!

Guy

Want Epson Stylus Photo 820 Inkjet Printer Discount?

I''m a commercial photographer, owning an Epson 1270 and the newer Epson 1280. Both printers are amazing, but expensive. I bought the Epson 820 for home use since it has the same specs as the 1280, just doesn''t print large output.

Straight out of the box, my printer was defective. The print head cleaning cycle indicated white lines. Contacted Epson and determined it was defective. The offered to send out a new unit. When it was returned, I found out it was a refurbished unit! Their policy is to replace your new printer with refurbished units. I find this extremelly irritating.

I did write a review such as this and Amazon has deleted it...I find that interesting. Much to the credit of Amazon, they picked up the slack and sent out a "new" unit. That''s why I shop at Amazon, amazing customer service. Unfortunately, the "new" unit is better, but exhibits the same problems. Epson has requested that I return the unit and try one more printer before requesting a refund.

I think Epson has really dropped the ball on this printer and I''ve had a very bad experience with their "policies". Amazon is the best and I wouldn''t hesitate to buy from them, at least they deliver on customer satisfaction.

Buyer Beware!

I have had problems with this printer and after two full days of trying to correct the problem it is going to be returned. I am using it with Windows 98 SE. I can only print 1-3 pictures at 5X7 using a usb connection when all of a sudden it will stop printing part way through the print and it freezes my computer. Epson Tech was of no help, furthermore expect to be on hold for about 15 minutes. My call was about 45 minutes in length and you have to pay for it, at daytime rates (no 1-800 number).

The print drivers were installed and re-installed, the device manager was checked for the printer and usb both were working properly. Everything other than the 820 printer was disconnected from the double usb connection on the back of the computer. The print spooler was changed from going into the hard drive to directly to the printer. All active programs were shut down except for explorer, systray and the existing print job. Ram was checked and was showing 76% available. A new 10 foot usb cable with gold tips was used all to no avail, the problem could not be solved.

When it was working properly, I found the printer to be above average in speed using a usb connection, about 3 minutes a print for 5X7 at 1440, with a parallel connection it took 11 minutes (very, very slow with parallel). If I had to use this machine with a parallel connection, I would consider another printer.

Print copy was superb, ink usage is awful, I used a whole color cartridge trying to sort out my problem to see if it was the printer or a conflict (it is the printer). I would estimate about 20-25 prints per color cartridge using 5X7 at 1440 (you do the math on cost) about 3 times more than my old 600.

I will get another 820 and see what happens, I am more than impressed with the quality of print on this machine both photo and text. I gave it a 4 rating only because of the problem and the fact that epson tech has no 1-800 number. Just for the quality alone it deserves a 4 rating.

When I get the next 820, if I have no problems and I get the same quality of print, then my only complaint would be the ink usage and cost and now in 2002 I guess you can''t get anything half decent without paying for it.

Because I have a problem at the present time I would not let this deter anyone from buying one, the chances are probably remote you would get one with the same problem I am having. I only mention this in print to see if any other owners do have the same problem and if they do then it would be good for readers to be made aware.

If you want extremely good photographic print quality, then this is the machine to buy. Remember you can always take it back if you have a problem. Epson will stand behind their product.

COMPATIBLE HP 49A Toner Cartridge (HP Q5949A) Save 88% off

COMPATIBLE HP 49A Toner Cartridge. Black Printer Cartridge for LaserJet 1160, 1320, 3390 series printers. HP Compatible COM-Q5949A Fits printer models: LaserJet 1160/1160Le/1320/1320n/1320nw/1320t/1320tn/ 3390
  • One year guarantee

Databazaar shipped me the item, but failed to put any packing materials in the box to keep the cartridge from banging around in the large box during shipping. Not that it needed much, but I figured the huge letters stating "FRAGILE" across the top of the cartridge box would give a hint that maybe a bit of packing material may be warranted here. They are not saving any money by shipping fragile items this way.

Onto the product itself...

The prints are perfect, and I would put good money on it that no one could tell the difference between the prints from this cartridge and one that came from HP. And do they really come from HP? I mean, it''s not like HP owns the facility that creates the cartridge; they simply contract it out to places that make other cartridges. So, it is very likely that some of these third-party cartridges have once (or do) manufacture HP cartridges.

The markings on this cartridge match up exactly with the markings on the HP cartridge I pulled out of the printer. Not a copy of the cartridge shell, but perfect stampings. So, I am going to go out on a limb here and guess that it is the same manufacturer for HP cartridges. Or, they get their shells from the HP manufacturer. Either way, it is almost indistinguishable from the original HP, and in almost every way.

The chip says "RECHARGE O8NON-HP12" on it. It reset the counter and the low toner light turned off on my 1320.

The paper sleeve that protects the drum during shipping is really cheap and came apart in pieces rather than just puling out in one piece. For those that gorilla grip everything and have no patience, you may want to take it easy lest you want pieces of protection paper in the drum.

The cartridge is surrounded by an AirPac pillow bag and a thick, puncture-proof, silver bag. No recycle bag or even documentation on recycling.

The cartridge-specific label on the outside of the box says "Made in China" and the generic "Premium Laser Cartridge" box is printed with "Toner made in Japan". Hmmm, which is it? Doesn''t matter to me, but to some country-of-origin-sensitive people this could pose a problem.

That''s all. It works, and works well. I can easily recommend this product for use in your HP LaserJet 1320.

Buy COMPATIBLE HP 49A Toner Cartridge (HP Q5949A) Now

These cartridges deliver inconsistent results.

Bought 3 of these cartridges in may. Print quality was mediocre on the first 2 cartridges. The second cartridge lasted shorter compared to the first (with around the same printout load). Print quality of the third cartridge is BAD. The pages come out with black lines. Totally unacceptable if you need to send out a letter.

Read Best Reviews of COMPATIBLE HP 49A Toner Cartridge (HP Q5949A) Here

Cartridge worked fine for about 100 pages, then fell apart. The pin that holds the drum in the cartridge fell out and the drum shifted rendering the printer unusable and jamming the cartridge inside. It took 15 minutes of wiggling and turning the printer to different angles to finally get the cartridge out and even then it came out in pieces.

I am a computer tech certified on HP products and usually have good luck with remanufactured cartridges but this one is simply not worth it.

Want COMPATIBLE HP 49A Toner Cartridge (HP Q5949A) Discount?

Don''t buy. Unacceptible print quality. smeers every where. Print a black streek in the middle of the page,

Save 88% off

I received the product ok, but when I put it in my printer--the machine did not recognize it. I am now in a hassle to return it and jump thru the hoops the supplier--Databazaar--puts you thru to get a refund. This is, I think, the worst internet purchase experience I have ever had. (I am just sorry that they don''t have a zero stars category.) Other than this, I have had great experiences with Amazon.

Konica Minolta magicolor 2300 DL Color Laser Printer

Konica Minolta magicolor 2300 DL Color Laser Printer
  • Up to 16 ppm monochrome, 4 ppm color
  • Up to 2,400 x 600 dpi resolution
  • Automatic duplexer efficient for two-sided printing
  • 32 MB fast SDRAM memory, upgradeable to 288 MB
  • Ethernet 10/100BaseTX networking; USB 1.1 and IEEE-1284 parallel interfaces

My deskjet 890c has seen better days, so I was looking for a fast printer with color capabilities and good quality print. For not much more than I paid for my last printer I got the speed, economy and quality of laser printing in my home office.

I have only had it for a few days, and have heard wildly different things about the last version of this printer that I thought I would share my experience with this printer after a few hundred pages.

I took advantage of the included network card and ran it into my siemens wireless router. I did have to call minolta to get it talking to the computer, but they answered after one menu and in one minute I was talking to a real live person. We reinstalled, synched up IP addresses and had it printing in about ten minutes. It prints beatifully, and you can print four full page photos in about the same time as my old inkjet. I think the page speed is accurate on this machine but with my old inkjet, it could take many times longer than the rated speed depending on what you are printing. The 2300 doesn''t seem to differentiate on what its printing the pages just spit out.

If its in energy saver, it does take maybe a minute to get the first page out, but its still faster than the first page out of my inkjet when printing invoices from quickbooks, etc. After its warmed up its pretty instantaneous. It does produce fan noise even when idle which some people may find distracting. It is probably noisier than an inkjet when printing, but its over a lot sooner.

I can''t speak for reliability, but I''m going to buy a 3 year onsite warranty plan that will run about 159.00 just in case.

I''m figuring that I will save money of consumables over my two tank inkjet, but I''m not really worried about that.

Monochrome print quality is as you would expect, awesome, no smudging, and a real professional look. Color is better than my old inkjet, but not significantly. Get a dedicated photo printer if that''s what you want. Full page photos off of my 1 megapixel camera are very decent. There is not a photo paper listed in the reccommended media so the point is moot. But the color does not seem to bleed when it gets wet.

I am not experiencing any buyer''s remorse with this purchase whatsoever. And thats after I practically begged the guy at staples business expo to sell me one.

Buy Konica Minolta magicolor 2300 DL Color Laser Printer Now

Here are my observations from in-box, through install, to printing:

1. Good packaging, solid handles on the box. The device weighs 60+ LBs and the handles made it easy to manuever into my NOC.

2. Packaging was simple and efficient, printer has about 10 strings of blue tape to stiffen the joins for shipping. As a nice touch, all the tape ends were dog-eared making removal simple an painless. The documentation also clearly describes all the loactions so this process is simple.

3. Plugged it in, and turned it on. It''s a little noisy but then my SUN Ultra 30 isn''t exactly quiet so it doesn''t bother me. I printed the configuration page and then the demo page and was delighted to see crisp, sharp output.

4. The printer comes installed with 32MB of RAM but the manual states that it will accept PC100 and PC133 SDRAM DIMM modules of either 128MB or 256MB. This is a great relief as I have an extra gig and I will put it good use now. The only drawback was that there is only one expansion slot available for upgrading the RAM. I have not done this yet, but the upgrade indicates that higher resolution printing will be available.

5. Network configuration was a breeze I let my dog handle it while I made coffee. He reported that you just use the menu to insert the IP, MASK and Gateway. He has trouble with CDROMs so I installed the software. The installation was clean and simple. I thought I was going to need to add the printer to the DNS server or hosts file but the installer detected the machine on the network and got everything installed. The network test page was printed next and everything came out fine. I could have let the cat do it but neither the dog or I trust him.

6. I did not test out the BOOTP or DHCP protocols so I cannot say what their functionality looks like, but if the rest of the process is any indication I am sure they are functional and easy to setup.

7. I also didn''t tryout the parallel port or USB connection either, so #6 applies to them as well.

8. The 2300 DL requires extra hardware to provide duplexing and it''s a little costy so if that is a necessity consider that into your cost matrix.

9. The provided paper hopper doesn''t appear to take more than about 200-225 pages of 24# paper. You can get another upgrade that provides 500 pages of media but its about as well.

10. The size of the printer is pretty svelte but a little tall (especially if you get the extra media tray. The location of the network/power jacks is on the left side which seems a little odd and out of place it would be nicer if they were in the back out of view but that''s a pretty minor complaint. Overall the printer is attractive and professional looking (if that is of great concern in your buying decisions).

11. The front bezel seems to only lock in place at the top/middle. This leaves the lower part of the door a little loose and I would have liked it be a little more secure.

Overall

============

This is a very good printer. It may be a little expensive for home users but if you want to get into good, quality color printing this is it. The output so far is almost picture quality. If you look closely you can detect a little of the jaggies but the increase it RAM should help. The HP competitive product was next to this one [in the store] and in side to side comparisons: was $ more expensive, didn''t have network connectivity out of the box, was slower, and print quality was slightly less.

Read Best Reviews of Konica Minolta magicolor 2300 DL Color Laser Printer Here

Laser printers are potentially superior to inkjets because of the laser''s unsmudgeable ink. However, for years the affordable laser printer with good resolution and good colors has been a mirage on the horizon. Finally, it has arrived as the Minolta Magicolor 2300 DL.

Can you tell that I am excited about this printer? I did not consider the companion printer, the 2300W, because of its lower resolution.

This sucker is heavy. It might be wise to get help before lifting it onto its table.

Installation was a bit rough. I''m on Windows ME, but the installation software did not offer a Windows ME option. I chose the closest, Windows 9x. You can also tell it which drive to install from, but why bother, it will just continue from where it started, right? Wrong. The software tried to read from my camera card reader and froze. I rebooted, restarted installation, and told it to install the Windows 9x driver from the CD drive. This worked.

I have downloaded the more recent driver from the Minolta web site but am in no hurry to install it because the driver that came with the printer has caused me no problems except the minor installation problems noted above. Note that I am *not* using this printer''s networking capabilities.

Looking at the pics of the tilted control panel, you might think that the LED position is adjustable, like on the Hewlett Packard Photosmart 7550. But the LED is firmly fixed and will remain at that same, exact tilt for the life of the printer. Comments by other reviewers that the LED is hard to read are NOT exaggerated. To read the light lettering, I need a flashlight.

In planning where you might put this printer, note that a corner would be inconvenient. You will need to access the 2300 from at least three, possibly all four sides: Front to use the control panel and replace the toner cartridges, left for the paper tray, right to clear paper jams (I''ve had none yet) or optionally install the duplexer, and back to access the motherboard if you add memory.

Another planning consideration is that this printer might not be a good choice for printing lots of small jobs. Hidden away in the back of the user''s guide, in the section on replacing the drum cartridge, is the statement that the drum cartridge does cleaning rotations after every job; therefore, lots of small jobs wear it out faster.

The user''s guide says that more memory improves resolution for large-coverage graphics, especially when combined with duplexing. So I bought a 256-MB PNY PC133 SDRAM DIMM from Amazon for one eighth the price charged by Minolta. Getting under the cover of the 2300 was easy enough. The memory socket was empty. (The on-board 32MB chip is somewhere else.) I seldom install memory and found this module stubbornly difficult to seat, but after gentle rocking it finally went in. When I printed a config page, the printer recognized the extra memory, for a grand total of 288 MB. Technically, I have now voided my warranty because the user''s guide says that''s what happens when you install an accessory not sold by Minolta. And the memory upgrade is listed under "Accessories". However, the memory installation instructions do not explicitly say that you must install Minolta''s.

Although I have not noticed improvement in the resolution, which I already liked, I have yet to run detailed comparisons with my dozen or so "before" samples.

Colors are about equal in quality to those of my Photosmart inkjet, except for one problem: Pure yellow becomes yellow-green. (Greens, however, look OK.) I ~hope~ that this is merely due to contaminated yellow toner and that the problem will disappear after I use up and replace the yellow cartridge. I don''t know about you, but I seldom need to print pure yellow. I plan to print such pages on the inkjet, then spray them with clear acrylic to discourage the smudge imp. This is good news--I still have a use for the inkjet and the coated paper that I bought for it.

Text is crisp and dark. I definitely prefer it to the lighter text from my old IBM laser printer.

2300 output looks quite attractive on a bright-white 24-lb. laser paper such as Hewlett Packard laserjet paper. Unlike inkjet ink, laser ink/toner does not soak into plain 24-lb. paper, and it binds to a plain surface just fine. Indeed, the user''s guide warns that coated inkjet paper will damage the 2300. If you print on both sides, heavy-coverage graphics can cast a shadow on the opposite side of 24-lb. paper, but mainly when the reader lifts the page and lets light shine through from the other side, and I don''t think it''s enough to bother the reader. Next up the scale is Hewlett Packard 28-lb. "color laser" paper. Great White soft-gloss (coated on both sides) 32-lb. laser paper looks even nicer because of the glossy white spaces--for example, the margins. And if you print on both sides, it is more opaque. It is like the paper in an expensive coffee-table book. Adding to the opulent appearance is the delightful soft gloss of the 2300�s �ink� (if that is the correct term for fused toner). I cannot imagine any reason to use a heavy-gloss paper in this printer.

I plan to buy the duplexing attachment later, and after I install and use it, I will add a note here about that experience. I''ll also let you know whether the yellow-green problem persists or was a fluke.

TWO MONTHS LATER: The problem with the yellow was a fluke. It went away after about 200 pages. It may have been something used in sealing the toner bottle.

.

I am wavering on the duplexer because of the high price and because it does not accept 28-lb. and 32-lb. paper, which I plan to use.

Want Konica Minolta magicolor 2300 DL Color Laser Printer Discount?

I just bought this printer last week, and have had a chance to look it over thoroughly and do quite a bit of printing.

The good:

If you want nice color prints and speedy b&w laser text output, you cant go wrong here. On regular white copier paper this produces better color prints than the Epson 700 and 800 series inkjets (my other two printers) did on special coated photo paper. The b&w text output is crisp and better than my last two monochrome lasers. This unit allows me to work from one printer, without compromise. It has a good range of connection options, ethernet, usb and parallel. As can be expected, hooking it up to a network is nothing short of rocket science so I can understand why some buyers would give a bad review based on that. But this printer is no different from any other network printer, the complexity is in the way microsoft does networking, not in the printer itself.

Color photos come out with a slight gloss to them...less than inkjets on coated paper...less than a real photo...but a nice shine. I hear there are some semi-gloss laser print papers that produce a better output. I dont have a need to spend money on that, these are good enough. I also hear that using superwhite (100+) copier/printer paper produces even better results. When I use up the rest of the case of 80 white I bought 2 years ago I''ll do that. If there is any question on output quality, I''m printing my wedding photos on it and the wife is very happy with them. Some reviewers have been upset that putting coated photo paper in them causes the paper to melt. Thats because you arent SUPPOSED to put coated inkjet photo paper into a laser printer. It says so in the manual, and it usually says so on the printer paper package. Read the manuals!

By the way, printing monochrome text pages in the "color" mode slows down the output to the same 4ppm as color prints. Make sure you default the printer to B&W output and change it to color only when you want it. Then it''ll step the printer up to the faster b&w print rate of 12-15ppm.

The bad, revealed:

Its loud and clunks a lot when printing as it has to change between four toner cartridges. Theres a fan that runs all the time. If this was in a small business environment and I had to sit within 5'' of it all day, I''d be unhappy. I use this at home. I turn it on, print my stuff, turn it off, no problems.

Speed is not as high as some other lasers. Hmm, it churns out four pages a minute in color and about 12-15 in black and white. Plenty fast enough for me...what are ya gonna do...print out 500 color prints an hour??

Many have maligned the ''design'' with regards to where the connections are. On mine, the connections are on the left side of the printer, at the back. Paper loads on the left side, just in front of the connections. So you cant slip this printer into a corner with the left side up against a wall. You cant put another printer within a foot of this one on the left side. Its a little ugly to look at the wires, and you cant turn it to put the wires on the back as this is where the paper goes. Kinda a dumb design. Had they put the paper feed on the opposite side, you could put the wired side to the back. I guess if you dont print an awful lot you could just stick 200 sheets of paper in it, turn it around and then pull it out to put more paper in. While its dumb to have done it this way, its not the end of the world for me.

Size. Its very large, but its a tall thin printer. Takes up about the same desk space my old monochrome laser took up. Its also pretty heavy so if you have a dinky table, I''d find someplace else to put it.

The software. The software is weird. For starters its written in Java and installs Sun''s JavaVM on your machine all by itself without asking you if you want to do that. I didnt particularly. I also wonder what the rocket science is in writing an installer that isnt dependent on other software packages. But some people cant live with simplicity. The software was not able to perform an adequate network installation of the printer, I had to do it manually. I also had to hook up and connect the printer via USB before running the software, or the install bombs...usually printer software is installed first, so when you connect it windows can automatically recognize it. Even when connecting it first, windows wanted to install it and so did the setup program, so I had to exit the windows new hardware install. Goofy.

Printer memory. More unclear thinking on QMS/Minolta/Konica''s part. The printer comes with 32mb of installed memory. You can add more via a plain old fashioned pc100/pc133 DIMM, and I certainly have plenty of those lying around. Unfortunately for many, the printer wont print at full resolution in color without 64MB, and requires 256MB to do full page duplex printing. Fer cryin'' out loud, this old memory is something like $10 for 256MB in volume...whats the problem with loading up the printer at the factory? Of course, you have to remove 11 screws to get at the memory slot. This may explain why some reviewers said the printer wouldnt print a full page of color print.

The LCD display. Its not backlit. In a darker room, you cant read it. With light directly on the screen, you cant read it. With moderate to bright room lighting and looking at it indirectly or by shading it from direct light, its perfectly readable. Not really a huge problem, but one has to wonder what the impact of spending an extra five bucks on a backlit LCD display the size of your little finger would have been...?

I''d also have liked to install the latest drivers and software, but Konica/Minolta/QMS''s web site wasnt available/responding when I went there.

Non-PC support. I guess if you have a Mac or Linux machines, the drivers are lousy and the support isnt very good. I dont have either of those, so its not a problem for me.

No support for PCL/Postscript. These are ''printer languages'', PCL is from HP and postscript is Mac. This is a ''winprinter'' which means any windows application that prints through windows will work fine with it. If you have some godawful old home written application that writes PCL or Postscript straight to the printer, you''ll get gobbledegook output. I havent seen one of those kinds of apps in a very long time. Like ten years or more. If you''re running Word or Powerpoint or any other regular old windows app this is a big fat "so what?".

Bottom line: its pretty, its a little noisy when operating, it has some layout and engineering/design foibles, makes great prints, and is a very very good printer for a home user or small business user. For a small biz user, I''d make sure this sucker is away from the workers desks. Installation could be smoother, but its not a huge problem. If possible, get the printer with the high capacity cartridges installed rather than the starter cartridges. From what I''ve seen the printer can be bought with the high capacity cartridges for the same price as the four cartridges themselves. Which in a way makes it a disposable printer...why spend more to replace the cartridges, drum and waste toner cartridge when you can buy a whole new one and just sell or donate the old one?

Ironically, lower cost printers like the Okidata 5100 feature Color Postscript, PCL5, and hence is supported by almost every operating system out there, linux, unix, freebsd, os/2, windows, mac, macos-x.

The 2300, however, would qualify as a "winprinter" since it uses a proprietary page description language and protocol, to encode and send the page images from the pc to the printer.

There are beta-level linux drivers, created by a third party by reverse-engineering the proprietary page description protocol, but the capabilities of these experimental third party drivers do not come even close to the original proprietary drivers for windows provided by QMS.

In short: it''s a winprinter. If you want a standards-based printer that supports PCL5, Color Postscript, and works with any operating system, check out the Okidata 5100.

The predecessor, the QMS 2200 "Magicolor", is also a Winprinter (more appropiatelly, a "GDI printer", in the sense that it uses a proprietary protocol and the Windows Graphics Engine (Microsoft technology) inside the printer. AVOID THAT, get a real color printer with PCL5 and/or Color Postscript

Ricoh Aficio GX7000 GelSprinter Color Printer (405635)

Ricoh Aficio GX7000 GelSprinter Color Printer
  • High Quality / High Productivity
  • Print Sizes up to 11.0 x 17.0 / Tabloid
  • Resolutions up to 1200 x 1200 dpi
  • Black / Color Print Speeds up to 29 ppm
  • Paper Capacity - 250 Pages / Expandable

I purchased one of these for sublimation and was so impressed with it I bought 2 more (one for another specialized ink and one for a standard printer). Unfortunately one of them wouldn''t pull paper from the paper tray so I ended up calling support. I explained what was going on and what I had done to troubleshoot the issue. After asking me a few more questions the tech apologized for the problem and told me that these printers do not have this kind of problem and I must have gotten a lemon. So they shipped me a new one. It was one of the most painless support calls I''ve ever had to make.

Besides that problem the printers have been solid. They are a great printer for those that print. If you aren''t printing a few pages with it every week I hear there can be problems but I print so much that I don''t have to worry about that. The large format sizes through the bypass tray really give this printer a lot of options. They have been trouble free other then the aforementioned problem. I would recommend to any business.

Buy Ricoh Aficio GX7000 GelSprinter Color Printer (405635) Now

WE WERE LOOKING FOR A COLOR LASER PRINTER THAT HANDLED LARGE FORMAT. DECENT PRINTERS WERE AT LEAST 2-4K. NOT ONLY WAS THIS PRINTER UNDER 1K, BUT IT PRINTS IN COLOR, WIDE FORMAT, FAST, HIGH QUALITY, AND THE GEL INK HAS HIGH YIELD, EVEN BETTER THAN MOST COLOR LASER PRINTERS. PLUS THE INK DRIES COMPLETELY OUT BEFORE RE-FILL IS NEEDED, UNLIKE OTHER LASER CARTRIDGES WHICH PROMPT REFILL IS NEEDED WHEN ITS NOT EVEN EMPTY. OVERALL WE ARE VERY SATISFIED. WE DID NEED TO ADD A NETWORK INTERFACE CARD AND A BYPASS TRAY.

Read Best Reviews of Ricoh Aficio GX7000 GelSprinter Color Printer (405635) Here

This printer has powering up issues. I have owned my printer for less than two years and have only printed about 30 sheets of paper in it.It will not power-up. I spoke with Ricoh and was told this is an issue with these printers and this problem can not be fixed. They will not offer any support for this even though they know its a common problem.I spoke with the dealer that sold me the printer, they also knew of the problem and offered to sell me another printer. Why would I want to buy another one? This printer was not cheap. The only thing it is good for now is the scrap pile.Ricoh''s phone number (1-800-742-6438) Call them and ask about powering up issues and if they have a fix for it. Maybe they will tell the truth.If you still want to buy this piece of junk,get the extended warranty from amazon. You will neeed it.

Want Ricoh Aficio GX7000 GelSprinter Color Printer (405635) Discount?

Ricoh uses Epson heads and they are well aware of the problems. These heads are not replaceable. Even on the cheaper model the 3300. Now they come out with another new printer to replace the GX7000 and you pay $1800 and still get the same problem head. If you buy one, buy t he warranty!

The printer has a known problem with the board that can not be fixed. If you power off your printer there is a good chance it will not come back on. They offer a 90 warranty on the printer but most people have to send them to the land fill after about a year. Save your money and buy something else.

Polaroid CZA-20011B PoGo Instant Mobile Printer (Black)

Polaroid CZA-20011B PoGo Instant Mobile Printer
  • Portable photo printer delivers full-bleed borderless images that are dry to the touch
  • Features automatic image quality optimization with water-resistant, tear-proof, smudge-proof and peel-off prints
  • Prints 2 x 3-inch borderless color images in under a minute
  • Wireless-capable Bluetooth hard drive interface; USB 2.0 hard drive interface
  • For use with digital cameras and select cell phones

I purchased the Polaroid PoGo today and have done a fair bit of "playing" with this compact little printer over the past couple of hours. In fact, I have already used the first package of 10 sheets of Zink (Zero Ink) paper that come with the printer. So my first recommendation is; if you are planning on buying a PoGo, I highly recommend getting extra paper so you can get through your "testing" phase without having to purchase more paper. However, don''t go crazy and buy too much, there are expiration dates on the paper which may affect your picture quality if you take to long to "expose" (print) them.

Connectivity:

I have tested the Bluetooth capabilities with my Motorola Q, Laptop Computer (Bluetooth enabled), my desk-top Windows Vista computer (with Radio Shack "Bluespoon" Bluetooth 2.0 adaptor added) and my PictBridge capable Canon Powershot A 640 camera (directly connected to PoGo via USB cable) and the printer worked like a charm in all of the above tests!

Speed of Printing:

Print time is about 1 minute per photo. There was no noticeable change in print speed with any of the tests I performed. Using the Bluetooth (wireless) connection or plugging in your USB cable directly from your camera did not seem to make any difference as to how fast the image printed.

Image Quality:

Not great...but not the worst I have seen either...The pictures I printed from my camera (via USB connection) looked better than my pictures from my cell phone, but this was likely due to the higher megapixel image created by my camera versus the 1 megapixel image from my cell phone. However, the "white balance" of both my camera and cell phone images were a little "off". The whites were extremely white (almost washed-out) and the dark (shadow areas) were very dark. So if you stay away from printing bright "beach / snow" images or dark "night" photographs you will be OK. Photos with lots of color (flowers, for example) looked pretty good when printed with the PoGo.

Cool things to do:

The adhesive on the back of the photo paper is a nice feature of this product. This makes it possible to add pictures to your hand written journals. You can stick them to business card magnets and put photos all over your refrigerator. You can make photo luggage tags, cards and much, much more.

If you don''t need the highest quality image, but want to do some fun, creative stuff with photographs I would definitely recommend the PoGo. If you are a photographer hoping that the PoGo would give you a quick "proof" of what your printed images will look like, then this printer is probably not for you, since the image quality is not as good as you could get with some standard ink jet printers.

Have fun...

Buy Polaroid CZA-20011B PoGo Instant Mobile Printer (Black) Now

This is a fun little printer mainly for on-the-spot prints. Kids especially like getting prints instantly. The Bluetooth connection works well, as does PictBridge via USB cable directly to camera. The unit is small enough to fit in a jacket pocket you can take a picture of someone with your cell phone camera, send it to the printer wirelessly, and then magically hand them a print a few minutes later.

Now for the rough spots. While I really enjoy this printer, you should probably be aware of some hassles you may encounter (as I did). The battery life is not super-great it''s rated at 15 pictures, but if it''s cold outside you may find the battery dead until you warm the unit up again. The metal case doesn''t help matters in this regard. You can bring the charger with you, but be aware that the charger is about as big as the unit itself a minor annoyance.

Picture quality there''s a reason the prints are so small. The quality is somewhat marginal, but usable. Most people are impressed that the thing exists in the first place and don''t scrutinize the prints that much, so the quality is generally good enough. I attended a wedding and started printing lots of prints for an on-the-spot scrapbook. The printer started streaking badly on the prints. There is a cleaning process you can run, but it became quite a time-consuming hassle. Not to mention the waste each time a print was unusable.

I still give it four stars because it''s a fun product and usually works well. The Bluetooth connection is a great feature for cell phone pics. Just be aware that you may have some occasional hassles.

Update: I''ve discovered that I get consistently very good looking results by keeping the special blue cleaning/calibrating sheet that comes with each pack. I run the sheet through before using the printer each day (if it hasn''t been used that day), and also after every three prints. The colors come out nice and rich, and no streaks!

Read Best Reviews of Polaroid CZA-20011B PoGo Instant Mobile Printer (Black) Here

I used to take my old Polaroid on every trip and give people a picture of themselves and while they were admiring it would snap another picture--they were always smiling in that second picture. Now I can do it again. I have only printed a few samples but am very happy with the quality (printed from my Canon SD900) and time to print. My only negative comment is that the charger is large and heavy. I am hoping I can find an extra battery as sometimes it is hard to find electricity for charging when traveling. I definitely recommend this product.

Want Polaroid CZA-20011B PoGo Instant Mobile Printer (Black) Discount?

The new PoGo mobil printer from Polaroid is a very nifty little gadget. While not a high end printer, this will serve the BBQ, sports, school, birthday party, college campus circles just fine. I also see vast almost unlimited potential for artists. Being an artist myself and a lover of traditional Polaroid film this new portable printer is a new step in the right direction for Polaroid. With no ink to speak of this ZINK, (zero ink) printer removes a very pricey aspect of home based printing. I found a pack of 30 prints for a mere $10 at Best Buy today. I was also the only one waiting to get one of these when the doors opened.

I already see that a digital camera/POGO printer is in the works. taking pictures with this thing is actually all that is lacking. The print size is small but i am sure Polaroid is just testing the waters. With their old technology cameras and film on the way out, it is nice to see a new, simple, clean technology replacing the old before it has even left the shelves. I do love traditional Polaroid film and hope they find a way to keep it around, even if only in a limited/artsy capacity.

The quality on these small prints is decent. Nothing spectacular though. Decent enough for casual prints. Nothing more.

Thoughts for future models:

* Larger Paper Models

* Built in Camera with a macro lens

* Cool Polaroid Special Effects (BW, Old film, Sepia, negative, borders, Etc.)

* Miniature Spy version

* I''m sure I will think of more after a few days.

So that is the skinny so far. great little product with room to grow.

First of all, this is really easy to use. I simply hooked it up to my camera, set my camera to browse photos and an option to print popped right up it couldn''t have been easier. The photos are pretty quick to develop and look great. I agree that the print quality is not perfect, but I actually like this you can get kind of neat effects (nothing dramatic, but the prints have a particular feel to them, just like classic polaroid pics). If you are looking for precise realism, this isn''t the printer for you. However, if you are looking for a fun way to give people a copy of the photo you just took or you want to create a collage or use these photos as part of an art project, etc., then I highly recommend the Pogo. I have thousands of photos stored on my computer but I almost never print them out because it seems like a hassle and gets expensive. However, I have already printed out 40 pogo pics and had a blast doing it!

Avery Light T-shirt Transfers for Inkjet Printers (4384)

Avery Light T-shirt Transfers for Inkjet Printers, 4 x 6-Inches, White, Pack of 15
  • Quality results for a professional, fashionable look
  • Use to personalize your T-shirts, hats, pants and even bags
  • Specially designed for 100% cotton or cotton/polyester blend fabric
  • Should not be used on expandable fabrics such as spandex or ribbed fabric
  • Sheet size is great for decorating sleeves, logos and accessories

Like many of the other reviewers mentioned the instructions are completely WRONG! Don''t follow the instructions included in the package! You don''t need to peel the transfer away from a backing paper, there is no wax sheet included, and you do need to mirror the image in order to have words show up the correct way and not backwards. That said, here are the correct instructions on how to use this transfer paper. Just click on "Light Tee Shirt":

[]...

Once I figured out that Avery included the instructions for a Dark Tee Shirt Transfer, I looked up the info and tried the Light Tee Shirt Transfer. The transfer comes out quite nice. You really need to use a non-stretchy type of fabric for the transfer to come out clearly and not rip. In other words, a tee shirt from Michaels will work well, but a onesie by Gerber will not. I tested this out on a tote bag, and the transfer looked very nice. I haven''t washed the bag yet, but once I do, I probably will turn the bag inside out so the transfer will not come off.

For those looking to put a smaller image on your clothes/bags/projects, the 4x6 paper is great. Recommended, but definitely look up the instructions before you start!

Buy Avery Light T-shirt Transfers for Inkjet Printers (4384) Now

I read the instructions three times because they didn''t make much sense. Do not reverse the image, no ironing board, no steam, remove the backing before applying??? I did as it said, got to the step where you are suppose to peel the backing off before ironing, yeah right! The sheets are thinner then regular inkjet paper and there is no backing to peel away. I shredded three sheets trying to remove the backing that is simply not there. You can scratch off the image which makes me wonder how you could iron this on face up unreversed without searing the image to the bottom of your iron not the shirt! I was not willing to possibly destroy my expensive iron because of bad instructions.

This is the stupidest product ever! The instructions don''t seem to be the correct ones for this product in any way shape or form. It is also strange that the package does not say anywhere that this is for dark fabrics yet the instructions say for dark fabrics and the sheets say on the back for light fabric, WHAT?, very confusing! I would not recommend this product based on what I received. The instructions included make it impossible to know how to use this product.

Read Best Reviews of Avery Light T-shirt Transfers for Inkjet Printers (4384) Here

These work well for what they are. Like any other t-shirt transfer they need to be cut closely to the image to make them look decent. They wear well, we used them for a company event, but after about 15 washes they are starting to peel off a bit.

Want Avery Light T-shirt Transfers for Inkjet Printers (4384) Discount?

This photo transfer paper works great. I am not using it for T-shirts, but the wife wanted to start a memory quilt. I took several photos that I had archived and using this paper, printed them from my Canon printer. The iron on transfer to the cloth she is using went perfectly and she is extremely happy with the results. It looks as if I will be ordering quite a bit more of this so she can finish her quilt.

First off, the instructions for this product are virtually non-existent. I only got the dark fabric instruction sheet which was not all that helpful in helping me figure out what to do for lighter fabric. The "included" tissue for doing dark fabric transfers was NOT included. Also, on those instructions they tell you to remove the paper backing. The backing does not come off. I wasted a lot of time trying to remove the paper backing and only succeeded in tearing the transfer sheet to pieces.

I think it''s fairly simple to figure out what to do, but some instructions would have been really nice. I put the picture face down (do this on light fabric only, on the dark it did not show up at all) and put the iron directly on the backing, peeled the backing off, and there was my image. These are Christmas presents so I don''t know how well they are going to hold up, but they look pretty good right now. That part of the product, I am happy with. But it does look like the colors smear a bit during application, though not enough to keep it from looking good.

If your image isn''t going to take up the whole sheet, you need to cut it out because it leaves a stiff, shiny film behind. This doesn''t matter much on white fabric, but on colored fabric, the less of that the better. You also do need to flip whatever image or words you are going to use on the transfer.

The best part of this product is that the template for this was easily found for free on the Avery website.