- Industry-leading pigment ink technology - Epson UltraChrome Hi-Gloss 2 pigment ink for colorful, vibrant prints
- Individual, larger ink cartridges - change cartridges less often and get up to 50% more prints2
- Professional media versatility - accommodates cut-sheet and roll paper in sizes up to 13" wide
- Unparalleled connectivity - Hi-Speed USB 2.0, wireless 802.11n and 100 Mbit Ethernet support
- Auto-selecting Black inks:Achieve optimal black density & superior contrast on glossy,matte/fine artpapers from either Matte/Photo Black ink
- Beautiful skin tones and a smooth, glossy finish
- Epson UltraChrome Hi-Gloss 2 pigment ink for beautiful skin tones and a smooth, glossy finish
- Industry-leading pigment ink technology - Epson UltraChrome Hi-Gloss 2 pigment ink for colorful, vibrantprints, beautiful skin tones
- Professional media versatility - accommodates cut-sheet and roll paper in sizes up to 13" wide,and a smooth, glossy finish
- Support sphotographic and fine art paper, canvas, 1.3 mm thick board and ink jet printable CD/DVDs
Pro. WIFI ready, compact, print on roll, print CD cover and professional quality for a $500 printer.
Con. Use a lot of Gloss-Optimizer ink in 2-1 ratio of other colors if print strictly in photo on luster paper.
Hope this review help your decision,
Thank you for reading.
Buy Epson Stylus Photo R2000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CB35201) Now
This gargantuan printer prints incredible photos. There are endless color adjustments possible and the prints are sharp and clear. I find the Adobe RGB setting to be most realistic color for fleshtones. The downside for me, and the reason I have to return this printer, is that although the printer is wireless and is supposed to be one of the printers that is Epson iprint enabled, the ONLY things that I was able to print through the iprint app were JPEGs. The app brings up choices of photos, docs, cloud storage, etc. as selections for printing, but each and every file type except JPEG produces an "unsupported file type" error. The printer is also not (yet) compatible with Epson''s email printing. To be clear, I was able to print all the file types I needed from my home computer/laptop. But much of what I want to print, I want to be able to do remotely from an android device.I contacted Epson about the JPEG only issue, as the types of projects I would be printing would include files other than JPEG and I regularly use andoid devices for at least parts of my projects. Epson''s response was as follows: "At this time, the JPEG file type is all that is supported. They are always updating this so it will most likely have more support in the future." I wish they could have given me something more concrete what additional remote printing options will be available and in what time frame. So I have to reluctantly return this printer, but will keep an eye on it to possibly purchase again in the future when updates to connectivity have been made.I purchased this printer in December 2011 and hadn''t opened it because I wasn''t sure of the location. I knew the printer would be large (did my research) so I waited until I found a spot. The set up was super easy and the printer found my wifi location very quickly. I love that the printer can be located anywhere in the house and doesn''t have to be directly connected to the computer.
The picture quality is absolutely brilliant. I didn''t know what to expect from a home photo printer but I had read so many reviews and run across so many people that have this model that I decided to bite the bullet (the $100 rebate also helped my decision). I''m a full time scrap booker and amateur photographer so I print a lot of photos. I like the freedom and flexibility of deciding how I want my photos printed on the spot instead of sending them out for print and realize that a different size photo would have worked better.
I just ordered extra ink cartridges from the Epson Store because I received a coupon code but the cartridges are a little pricey still.
All in all, I love this printer and recommend it.
Want Epson Stylus Photo R2000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CB35201) Discount?
After years of using Canon printers, I decided to purchase an Epson R2000 to replace my old Canon Pro 9000. It had finally given up the ghost after years of faithful service. Why the switch? I had never used pigment inks before, for fear of the nozzle clogging reported so frequently with their use. Also, color is my thing and the vividness of colors from the dye type inks was outstanding. But, I just wanted to try the pigment ink since I had never previously done so. I really didn''t care that they have, on average, twice the fading or color change resistence that dye inks do. The newest dye inks last upward of 100 years when kept in an album, and I''ll be long gone befoe any of them fade. People don''t realize that modern giclee(spray) prints, even the dye type, when done on matched paper, last much longer than the old wet lab prints we used to get from the photo lab. I have some old lab prints from 35 years ago that have faded to an overall magenta hue. These prints had not been exposed to daily sunlight. My preferred paper is the semigloss or luster type. I don''t use matte papers very frequently. I often do 12 x 18 prints on 13 x19 paper so a printer handling that format was necessary. Epson had introduced a new pigment printer in the 13 x19 format that seemed to be optimized for printing on glossy or semigloss type papers, the R2000. It used pigment inks, but from what I could determine, they gave beautiful vivid colors almost indistinguishable from dye based inks. The R2000 had all the bells and whistles I would ever need. I decided to give it a try.I am happy that I did try it out. The colors are as vivid as my old Canon Pro 9000. The Epson prints about as fast for comparable sizes as the Pro 9000 did. This had been a complaint with earlier Epson printers, slow printing. The new ones keep right up with the equivalent Canons that were among the fastest dedicated home photo printers. Clogging has not been a problem using Epson factory inks. I might try a non-manufacturer ink in a dye type printer, but I firmly believe it is best to stay with the factory inks in a pigment type printer. I have gone as long as one month between prints with the Epson, but have had no problems with clogged nozzles. Since pigment inks can have the pigment settle in the cartridge if it sits unused for a while, Epson includes a neat ink cartridge shaker in this printer. The larger format Epsons keep the ink mixed by bubbling air through the cartridge. This one shakes the cartridge up for 30 seconds. The shaker can be started any time by just going to the maintenence part of the driver and clicking on it.
Now to the important stuff: the print quality. In a word, outstanding! The vividness of the colors is a match for the Pro 9000. I have tried a number of papers, including the Epson factory papers, but the one I like best is the Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl. This is Ilford''s equivalent to the Epson Premium Luster. I have compared both and in my opinion the Ilford just edges out the Epson paper in vividness and color quality. That is something I didn''t expect since the Epson Premium Luster has such a great reputation. Ilford has a printer profile for using this paper in the R2000 printer and it works fantastically. I print out of Photoshop Elements and have a calibrated display. Using the Ilford profile, the results are truly WYSIWYG. I have tried a number of other papers including high gloss and matte, but the only one I really liked was the Red River Paper''s Polar Metallic. This stuff gives a print that looks for all the world like the metallic prints on Kodak''s special paper that you can get from a photo lab service. If you have a very colorful photo, and you want the colors to really pop, give the Polar Metallic a try.
In summary, I am very happy with my new printer. It does everything I want it to do and I do not see myself outgrowing it for a long while.
Save 3% off
First off, I want to say I''m primarily a photographer who in the past paid others to print out my photos. I always wanted to do my own printing but the start up costs and the steep learning curve kept me from attempting it. But then I read an article about the R2000 that made me curious whether or not this could be the printer for me. So I googled this reviews for this printer and couldn''t for the life of me find any bad reviews, in fact, they all said about the same thing excellent image reproductions along with the ease of not having to switch out the black cartridges. Then I see a rebate being offered by Epson for $100 off the top. This, coupled with free shipping and no tax, I couldn''t resist and I pushed the little yellow Amazon button.The printer arrived one day later (I did the $3.99 overnight shipping. How they can ship a printer overnight for only $3.99 is beyond me). Worried the set up would be complicated I read everything I could about it. Turns out the set up was painfully simple. Just remove the multiple strips of blue tape, plug it in and add the ink. One thing the instructions failed to mention is once you add the ink cartridges and close the hood you have to press the little "ink" button, whereas the instructions would leave you to believe simply closing the hood would trigger the priming. Nevertheless, it took maybe 5 min at the most to be up and running. The installation software was equally simple and took approximately another 5 min to install and to connect to my wireless network. Crazy simple, I thought, all the while waiting for the "other shoe" to drop. Printing will be another story, I thought.
Well, I couldn''t be more wrong. Printing was as simple as setting the printer up. The key is to be sure you understand color management and use the right profiles for both printer and paper. It took a little experimentation but nothing drastic. And once I dialed in it all began to make sense. As long as you have the profile for the paper (which is pretty much the profile for the printer, too) and you either choose to let the printer handle color management or you do it in Photoshop/Lightroom and you''re done. You may at first think your printouts are slightly darker than the monitor image would lead you to believe but generally they''re not. Part of the issue is that you have to match the same viewing light on the print out as you are in the monitor and once I used stronger light (or the sunlight) the image was indeed perfect. Don''t get me wrong, there were examples where the print out didn''t match the monitor but it always turned out to be an operator error and one that was easily fixed. Just be sure to use quality paper and soon your walls will be filled with images that before only existed in cyberspace!
To sum it all up, I highly recommend this printer to anyone looking to print high quality fine art images. You certainly can pay more for a printer with bigger numbers next to the words "Epson" but you really can''t produce a better print out with that money (with the possible exception of specialized B%W printers, but that''s another story altogether). Don''t be worried that you''ll waste ink trying to figure this one out because it really is as easy as they say it is.
0 comments:
Post a Comment