Inkjet Printable Cotton Fabric 25-Sheet Pack

Inkjet Printable Cotton Fabric 25-Sheet Pack
  • 200 Thread Count Chemically Treated Cotton
  • Works with almost all Inkjet Printers
  • Softer than the competition
  • Complete Step-by-Step Instructions included
  • Best Inkjet Printable Fabric Sheet

I purchased this printable fabric to make a retirement lap quilt. I was very pleased with the quality and whiteness of the fabric which produced very nice results when photos and messages were printed on it. I also use this to print my quilt labels on. I will never go back to any other brand. This is the best!

Buy Inkjet Printable Cotton Fabric 25-Sheet Pack Now

I have made two memory quilts using this product that have turned out beautifully. The quality of printing is excellent and easy to do. Buying in bulk saves you a bundle and shipping is faster than a speeding bullet. I would highly recommend using this fabric sheet over others. Follow easy directions and you will have a beautiful product in the end. I can say after two washes the pictures are holding up excellent. I would def. give it a 10 star rating if I could.

Read Best Reviews of Inkjet Printable Cotton Fabric 25-Sheet Pack Here

These are the best quality fabric sheets I have ever used! The white is brighter than other brands, and it is really easy to sew with. And it is great to be able to buy in quantity and save money!

Moab Colorado Fiber Satin Textured Archival Inkjet Paper

Moab Colorado Fiber Satin Textured Archival Inkjet Paper, 245gsm, 10 mil, 11x17'', 25 SheetsI used this paper for my final photography portfolio in college. Great paper, has some fiber to it and the luster is great! MOAB has great profiles and what you see on the screen is what you get on paper!

HP Laserjet M1319F Mfp Printer

HP Laserjet M1319F Mfp Printer
  • Multifunction laser printer that prints, faxes, copies, and scans
  • Print and copy in Black-and-white at speeds up to 19 pages per minute
  • Powerful 240 MHz Tensilica on-board processor with 32 MB of memory
  • Scan documents in full-color as large as 8.5 x 14 inches
  • 250-sheet paper tray, 10-sheet priority tray, and 30-sheet ADF

I had an HP Fax 1010 for my home office, and it was a trouper always worked great. But then HP had a recall due to potential fire hazard, and offered a rebate on several of their faxes and multifunction fax/printer/scanners.

So I went for the M1391F MFP. I don''t really care about printing I''ve got a color duplex laser printer for that. I wanted something that would fax, copy, and scan with an auto-feed.

Here''s what it''s good at:

1. Scanning letter-size pages (although their Mac software could use some work).

2. Copying letter-size pages.

3. Faxing letter-size pages to U.S. recipients.

And the document feed works great.

Here''s what it won''t do:

1. Scan legal-sized pages

2. Ring or make any kind of noise when it gets an incoming call, from a fax machine, cell phone, or land line. Even with all the volume settings turned to high.

3. Receive an incoming fax or phone call. At all. From anywhere.

The capper tonight was that I had to fax a time-sensitive document to New Zealand, and this piece of work thinks the NZ dial tone is a busy signal and won''t connect.

I tried to access HP''s live chat help desk, but nobody picked up in over a half-hour. So now I''m having an extended, hours-between-installments email correspondence with Nigel from Bangalore, and he''s asking me to verify the model number and what version of Windows is on the attached computer and am I using USB. Well, there is no computer attached, Nigel, I''m using this as a detached fax machine. But as someone who''s written printer drivers for your own company''s printers, and fax software for your competitors, I can assure you that if the attached computer is preventing this unit from receiving faxes or recognizing international dial tones, you need to look for another job.

I dug out the old 1010 and it sent the fax just fine.

This unit has a wonderful feature set. If only it worked. It''s useless to me, and I''m going to have to start looking for a fax machine that works.

When I was in grad school over 20 years ago, HP sold the best lab equipment money could buy. You knew if you got an HP gas chromatograph, or infrared spectrometer, or oscilloscope, you had the highest quality available on the planet.

Now... I''ve bought probably a dozen HP laser printers since 1990, and never even looked at another brand, with one costing over $10,000. But after this hunk of junk, I will certainly look at alternatives in the future.

Buy HP Laserjet M1319F Mfp Printer Now

This unit was purchased as a replacement for an HP1010 Fax Machine which was recalled by the factory, and an HP1010 Printer which was not recalled. Despite negative comments by others, I have found the M1319F Printer to be more than an acceptable replacement for both machines. It is in regular use and I have had no problems thus far. It has never failed to print, copy, or fax for me. I have found the print quality to be excellent.

The printed documentation that came with it was a little too spartan, but the manual on the installation CD is more than adequate (177 pages if you care to print it). As a bonus, the M1319F uses the same ink cartridge as the HP1010 Printer so for me, I only have to stock one cartridge for both.

Thus far, I have no regrets with my purchase, and I believe HP did me a favor by recalling the HP1010 fax which I did not like. The only reason I rate the M1319F 4 stars is because HP makes much heavier, more durable machines, albeit at a higher price.

Read Best Reviews of HP Laserjet M1319F Mfp Printer Here

The machine worked well for 3 weeks. Then it started to jam every now and then. It would try to grab too many sheets of paper from the tray. Changed paper and it happens less frequently.

Last week the fax section started to act up. It dials, hears the other machine answer then takes forever to send even the first page. Oddly, sometimes it will send multiple pages but doesn''t indicate that on the display. I have confirmed that the receiving fax machines were working fine. I send faxes to these other machines on a regular basis and now I can not. The light just flashes away and my phone line is tied up forever.

HP LaserJet M1319f MFP Multifunction ( fax / copier / printer / scanner ) B/W laser copying (up to): 18 ppm printing (up to): 18 ppm 280 sheets 33.6 Kbps Hi-Speed USB

Want HP Laserjet M1319F Mfp Printer Discount?

It definitely affects my confidence in HP printers. I used many HP printers in the past. This is the first one gave me so many problems. Give you one example: after installation I found it can only print portrait not landscape. After three sessions with HP technical persons, all together about 6 hours, it was finally fixed without knowing why. I am not going to list all the other problems. Some of them are minor. It is finally working at the moment. But I am worried about other surprises could hit me anytime.

Nevertheless, my experience with HP service personnel were pretty good. They were as patient as I was during the conference sessions. One of their supervisor or manage call me afterwards, asking if there is any other problems need help or want to exchange a new one. I told him if more problems occurs I probably would like to change to a new model, perhaps a more expensive and better one. I am still not very sure I should keep it.

Chung Ting, Los Altos Hills, CA

I bought this printer new for $215 from CompuBiz and I was disappointed with the scanning software that came with it. I bought it because of the low price per page to print and also because I like to scan documents into PDF often. When I tried the scanning software included, Readiris Pro 11, I was thoroughly disappointed. I have since learned that I can scan directly from my Adobe Acrobat 9 Standard and it works awesome. I immediately un-installed the Readiris Pro 11 that came with the printer and I am now a very happy customer. I don''t know why HP would partner with such a bad software provider. I therefore recommend this printer, but only if you are going to use Adobe Acrobat for the scanning software. Enjoy.

X-Rite CMUNPH ColorMunki Photo Save 11% off

X-Rite CMUNPH ColorMunki PhotoI''ve been giving the ColorMunki a workout for several weeks and find that it is easy to use and my print colors have never been more accurate. It replaces a first generation Pantone Colorvision Sypder I bought in 2002. My desktop is year old quad core PC from HP running Windows Vista Ultimate, an Acer Ferarri 20-inch LCD monitor and photo printer is an Epson Stylus Photo 2200 printer. I''ve seen a number of negative reviews here that leave me baffled, so I offer some advice.

1) Before you install ColorMunki software, be sure to un-install and/or disable other color management software, like Adobe Gamma. On Windows, I''d recommend using a good registry cleaner, like RegCure, to insure no color management applications are being loaded in the background.

2) Check to make sure your graphics card software is set to the defaults. Some games and photo editing software might "tweak" the color management settings.

3) The ColorMunki "Easy" mode calibration requires a good, late model graphics card and software controllable graphics monitor. For best results, use the "Adanced" mode and check both "Optimize brightness" and "Optimize Luminance" boxes.

4) Don''t calibrate you in monitor in "Advanced" mode a darkened room. A fairly high level of ambient light is needed to set reasonable levels of brightness and luminance on your monitor. This is likely the source of comments that brightnees on iMacs and other LCD monitors can''t be turned down enough to make the ColorMunki happy.

5) When creating paper profiles a) allow test prints to dry at least two hours before you scan them and b) make sure you scan the strips on top of a white card or stack of like paper. My fist calibration of Epson Ultra Premium Presentation Matte paper was a little off because I scanned it directly on my blonde wood desk.

6) Most laptop displays really cannot be calibrated adequately for critical color work because they use an integrated GPU with limited capability. Results are going to be disappointing if the laptop does not have a dedicated GPU, like the ATI Mobility Radeon X800 or nVidia GeForce 9600M GT and fully adjustable display. Only high end laptops meet this criteria, like the new MacBook Pro or HP Pavilion X16-1040.

7) Take your time. The brightness and luminance readings take about 30 seconds each time you make a change.

(written after two months of use)

PROS:

* Probably the most reasonably priced spectrophotometer on the market. Colorimeters are cheaper, but inferior.

* Extremely versatile in its ability to profile screens, projectors, printers and measure ambient light intensity in a single piece of hardware.

* Color profiles produced are very accurate, even profiles I''ve made for one printer using aftermarket inks significantly different from OEM in gamut and intensity.

CONS:

* Design of hardware is stylish, but at the expense of being practical. Rotating wheel can be difficult to turn and it is very easy to depress the button unintentionally.

* Software too simplistic and not likely to change. There are no true advanced options. The only "advanced" mode exists in monitor profiles, where it will measure ambient light and adjust display intensity accordingly, in addition to the color profiling.

I have a case where my printed photo profiles, while accurate, are too dark for intended viewing conditions. There is no way to tell the software to use a different tonal curve or tweak anything else, such as ink density, when the profile is made. As a result, I have to manually adjust every one of these images in photoshop before printing, which is a huge hassle. Even after lightening in ps, sometimes images are still too dark.

Note that this problem I have seems to vary with media type. Some media profiles do not exhibit this problem at all; it appears to be most pronounced in coated glossy photo paper.

I also fear X-Rite will never make the ColorMunki compatible with any of their more advanced software to prevent competition with their more expensive hardware. After all, why would all but the most serious photographers spend 3x + more on the next step up profiling hardware for a small incremental improvement in the hardware itself?

* Printer profiles can only be made on 8.5 x 11 or larger media due to the way it prints swatches for measurement. If you have smaller media, such as 4x6, you need to purchase larger of the exact same paper to get an accurate profile. Unfortunately, with media such as CDs, you''re out of luck. X-Rite should make media profiling more flexible in this regard.

* Printer profiles have to be created one at a time, and the software cannot be closed during the process. The printer profile process works as follows: you print the initial set of swatches (will always be the same for any media or printer), give sufficient drying time, read the swatches with the ColorMunki, print a second set of swatches automatically generated and based on the results of the first scan (these swatches will vary depending on media, etc. and can have slight variations even using the same media, printer and initial swatch printing), allow sufficient dry time for the second set then finally read this second set with the ColorMunki. The problem is if you are using media with very long dry times (or wish to provide long dry times) or need to profile many different types of media. The initial set of swatches can all be printed in advance, with appropriate dry times given, but once the second set has been printed, closing the application will require you re-print the second set; your progress cannot be saved and resumed later.

I suspect this was an intentional software design to prevent using this device for remote profiling, although anyone providing such services should be using high-end, professionally calibrated equipment.

* A minor quibble, but the zipper on the cloth zippered case with the counterweight broke two weeks after purchase. Since the case is somewhat necessary for monitor profiling (you can hold the device up to the screen, but must be careful not to press it on an LCD display). The case should have a more durable design, such as Velcro flaps for the enclosure and riveted hooks to attach the counterweight, rather than the (now broken) zipper.

Buy X-Rite CMUNPH ColorMunki Photo Now

Alright, no one wants to listen to me ramble or wax poetic, so here it is, short and sweet: I have used other monitor profiling hardware in the past, and all of them work to some extent, but nothing, regardless of cost, can compare with the X-Rite ColorMunki Photo. It is the most accurate and predictable piece of equipment like this I''ve ever used, and if all it did were accurately profile my dual displays, so that they finally matched for the first time since being purchased, that would be reason enough to be completely satisfied.

However, the real reason that I love my ColorMunki is that it also accurately profiles my Epson large-format printer. For the first time since buying this expensive puppy, what I see on my monitor actually appears on the prints that I produce. Regardless of whether the paper is watercolor, semi-gloss, glossy, or professional velvet, when the appropriate profile is created and then selected, the results are always 100% accurate and predictable. When you''re spending approximately $15 out-of-pocket for every print that comes out of this machine, mistakes are costly and amount to considerable money very quickly. In the first month since acquiring it, I have easily paid for my ColorMunki in paper and ink savings alone, to say nothing of the enormous amount of time and frustration that has been saved. Recently, I created a dozen large-format prints that I had orders for using only twelve sheets of paper. Previously, I would''ve used between thirty-six and forty-eight to end up with perfect final products. That means, from this one print job alone, my ColorMunki saved me between $360 and $540!

Buy your X-Rite ColorMunki Photo with absolute confidence, but don''t second-guess the setup or calibration procedure in any way. Follow the steps exactly as they are outlined in the extremely simple onscreen tutorial and your results will always be spectacular.

Read Best Reviews of X-Rite CMUNPH ColorMunki Photo Here

I''ve used a number of color calibration tools, and find the munki to be about the best for the money. (I use it on a Mac Pro with a 30" monitor and an HP B9180 printer.)

Color profiles are very tricky to use on the Mac, and even trickier on Windows. Basically, you need to make very, very sure that you''re not correcting the image twice. In Lightroom, for example, there''s a pulldown for whether LR or the printer manages its colors. Make sure your setting matches the printer driver''s setup! (This is somewhat done for you on the Mac, but not on Windows.)

Lightroom is the easiest tool to use for printing, at least in my experience. Doing it from Photoshop is harder, and you often have to wrestle with the various settings to get it right.

Anyway, I believe this double-correction issue has more to do with the negative reviews than any problems with the device itself. The munki is very, very easy to use. A lot of stuff that would be a lot of work in other tools (e.g. color calibration targets) is all integral to the device, and well managed by the munki software. The profiles themselves are absolutely great -at least for my setup.

Finally, if you care about getting photographs right -both on screen and on paper -a tool like the munki is essential. Editing photos on a well calibrated monitor will help ensure your photos will have a life beyond your current computer or screen. Imagine the trouble if you notice all your old pictures look a little greenish on your next computer. Which was right, your new machine or your old? And will you enjoy editing 5,000 pictures to fix the problem?

Bottom line: great tool for the dedicated amateur photographer. Everyone should at least calibrate their monitors. If a munki seems a little rich for your blood, then consider a Pantone Huey instead: Pantone huey MEU101

Want X-Rite CMUNPH ColorMunki Photo Discount?

Several issues with this product, all software related. I haven''t gotten far enough to qualify the icc results. First of all, the CD you receive has nothing on it except a small application that downloads the actual software. So, no internet connection, no calibration. I was installing on a laptop, and luckily was at home. Second, you only get three machine activations of the software.. after that I guess your Colormunki becomes an expensive paperweight. Good thing my camera isn''t restricted to 3 machines, or I''d really be in trouble. You also need that internet connection to "activate" your software. Under OSX it seems to only activate it for a single account. Thirdly, I was only able to calibrate one of my two monitors, the software produces an errors for the second. I''ll finish testing, but the 3 machine software installation limit for an expensive piece of hardware is asinine, and will most likely result in a return... especially since I have 4 machines at home.

Save 11% off

DELL 5230N Mono Laser Printer 45Ppm 1200Dpi Save 33% off

DELL 5230N Mono Laser Printer 45Ppm 1200Dpi
  • Sold Individually

High duty cycle printer that is well priced, highly regarded, and has lots of optional equipment. There is a newer model, the 5330, but it no longer supports an envelope feeder options and costs more. There is also a duplex version (with a d in the model number) but it costs much more. I only wish the print driver had support for a manual duplex (like my HP color laser). I bought it with a 21,000 page toner that makes this printer especially cheap to own. I paid just under $250 for the printer and just over $100 for the lifetime toner. I am very happy.

Save 33% off

C330DN Digital Colorprinter 23/25PPM, 12 Save 47% off

C330DN Digital Colorprinter 23/25PPM, 12
  • OKIDATA 62435103 C330DN Digital Color Printer
  • Robust features in a compact unit
  • Fast printing
  • Produce sharp, colorful documents
  • Built-in duplex printing

I bought this printer after a search for an ideal color laser printer for home. My wife needs to print in color for her cirriculum and I need to print on both sides of the page to save weight when sending out mailings. This printer does both and does them both well.

In case this is your first time to the rodeo, LED printers are like laser printers but instead of using a laser beam and a mirror there is a fixed array of LEDs which perform the same function. The claim is that this will reduce maintenance but I have never heard of anyone claiming "well, my laser printer was great, but then the laser died." or "well, if only the mirror assembly hadn''t broken in my laser printer..." no, usually it''s something to do with the drum, the fuser, constant jams, toner costs, etc. So I''m not sure LED printers are better than laser printers, but I took the plunge anyway.

So, about this printer. So it uses a grid of LEDs. In practice, the resolution is a little worse than a laser printer, but 600x1200 dpi is plenty respectable for print work. I haven''t even considered the resolution at any point in operating it.

The paper passes through a singular path, meaning that it doesn''t really change print speed based on whether it''s b/w or color, which is nice. I was surprised to print a full-page color photo in the same time it takes to print a text file. Generally speaking, that''s not common (try that on an inkjet!)

The printer comes with 1000-page toner cartridges, which are "starter" sized. Price per page is not significantly cheaper than an inkjet, after you factor in the costs of toner, but I''ve always found inkjet printers to be frustrating to deal with, for print speed, frequency of ink changes, dried cartridge nozzles, noisy feed/print mechanisms, and so on. So, this is a lot better than an inkjet in my book, but not for economy printing.

The duplexing is the standard "cheaper" method that requires the page to partially come out of the printer, then it sucks it back in for a second go-round. Nicer workgroup printers keep the document entirely internalized until it has printed on both sides. Still, it works fine and there''s plenty of room for it to do its thing and keep all the pages in order. It''s a great feature to have when you need it.

The color quality isn''t as good as an inkjet. If you want to print photos, you really would be better off simply ordering them online (just upload your jpegs, and so on) and getting them printed on $20,000+ professional printers for pennies. I think a 4x6 photo print is less than 10 cents, so buying an inkjet is just a waste of time in my book. Anyway, this printer is acceptable for all display/presentation work. It''s just not color accurate. They package software to attempt to correct the color, but this is unlikely to get it to "professional photo printer" levels anyway.

Black and white is great, as it should be. No complaints there.

No paper jams to report, and the whole printer seems easy to clear if there was a problem.

There is no wireless networking, only a 100mbit (no gigabit, but why would you need it?) ethernet port and a USB port.

Networking is simple and you can point a browser to the IP address to get status and even submit jobs manually if you don''t have a print driver installed (it lets you upload a pdf and print it out). Having a networked printer is great so you don''t need to have a computer on (though mine is on all the time anyway) if you want others to have access to printing.

Power consumption is like other laser printers. It''s significant when warming up, not too bad when printing, and very low when idle. Warm up time is only a few seconds, which is great.

The printer is a bit heavy/bulky, but it''s about the size of a larger all-in-one fax/copy/print machine (though it doesn''t fax/copy). It weighs about 55lbs.

Overall, I''d give it 5 stars. It fit my needs perfectly.

Buy C330DN Digital Colorprinter 23/25PPM, 12 Now

Unboxing this machine is a bit of a trial, not only because it masses around 50 lbs. The printed instructions are limited to internationalized sketches that barely match reality. Generally, pull any blue tape or orange chunks of plastic. Installing the toner cartridges is the next trial. The printer comes with the toners installed in the correct location and all you have to do is slide a lock/shutter. Sliding the locks takes a surprising amount of force, and with so much plastic, it is quite scary when it finally seems to break free and slam closed. I fully expected to break my printer before I''d even plugged it in.

On powering up, it automatically grabs a DHCP address off the network, and with little more than that, you''re printing! The front panel menu navigation is pretty straight forward, and you really only need to visit it once (more on that later). It speaks standard PCL and PostScript, so you may not even have to change the drivers in your computers to get it to work. I was able to use it as a drop-in replacement for a (hated) HP2550 Color LaserJet.

Although I haven''t tried the drivers, yet (I''m using basic PostScript) I am happy with the selection at least. Unlike many other devices, older and esoteric versions of Windows seem to be fully supported.

The printing is stunningly fast when compared with carousel printers like the HP2550. Even though this model comes with a relatively small amount of memory, it has no problems cranking out full-page graphics.

When the printer is awake, it can be pretty noisy. It doesn''t have the clunks and squeaks of the HP2550, just mostly fan noise. Fortunately, it can be configured to go to sleep pretty quickly, and once it is sleeping, it is completely silent. Unlike the 2550, it doesn''t wake up every 8 hours, either. It wakes up automatically when a print job comes in, and does so pretty quickly. That may not be true if you use the USB interface, though.

Laser printers should not be hooked up the UPS devices, and this machine is no different. The current draw on startup is enough to trigger nearby UPSs into brownout mode briefly.

The print quality is good. It manages to print intense colors with a somewhat glossy finish that compares remarkably well with photo printers. That seems to come at a cost of clarity, though, as some fine detail gets a little muddy.

Lastly, the network interface in this device is worth the entire cost of the printer. First of all, once you know the IP address of it, you never need to use the front panel again. Every single feature is easily controllable from the web interface. Beyond that, it has features that you would normally see in devices that cost thousands of dollars, including the ability to print-by-email, Internet Printing Protocol, the ability to print directly from an uploaded PDF file, SMNP managment, and so on.

So far, I''m very happy with this printer! One major problem, though: It ships with minuscule starter toner cartridges -maybe less than 500 pages worth -and toners are harder to find, since the Oki brand is somewhat uncommon. At least the toners don''t appear to be ''chipped'', and there''s a menu option (turned on by default, even) that will instruct the printer to continue even if it believes the cartridges are empty. I expect it will give me plenty of time to get replacements. This printer uses real toner-only cartridges, and not toner+drum units like other printers. Despite that, the cartridges are some of the most expensive I''ve ever seen. Figure in another $460 of toner costs once the starters go empty.

Read Best Reviews of C330DN Digital Colorprinter 23/25PPM, 12 Here

I use this printer in my home office, and routinely print out lengthly colour docs.

Pros:

>Excellent output, crisp text, nice colors. As good as any color laser, I''ve used including hi-end ones found in corporate offices.

>Well designed, easy to set up, toners are extremely easy to replace.

>Respectable page per minute output, duplex printing works flawlessly. Printed reams of paper without a single jam yet.

>Works well on Mac or PC platform.

Cons:

>Noisy when printing. Much louder than the HP laser jet I replaced it with

>Replacement toner is extremely expensive, and hard to find at discount retailers or locate remanufactured toners. If I had known, I probably would have gotten a different printer.

>The toners that come with the printers didn''t last that long. Perhaps that is to be expected, and perhaps the replacement toners will last longer.

> Papers curl when printing, so when printing long documents some times pages will end up scattered on the floor.

Want C330DN Digital Colorprinter 23/25PPM, 12 Discount?

The Okidata C330dn color laser printer I recently received from Amazon is even faster than the C3200n I used for six years. Text is absolutely crisp and clear, music notation looks professional, and photos and other graphics are excellent.

PRO''s:

* Very FAST (starts pouring out the pages in seconds and they just keep coming);

* Images are very SHARP (especially compared to inkjet printer text);

* This laser printer uses only a SINGLE DRUM, instead of the typical four (thus cutting repair costs significantly);

* The unit has a significantly LOWER PROFILE than earlier Oki models (than most other laser printers), especially with regard to its height, about 9");

* The TONER CARTRIDGES have a greater yield now (about 3,000 pages for color, 3,500 for black).

CON''s:

* The unit is quite LOUD at start up, but once on-line (in about a minute) it is not very noticeable. After a few minutes of inactivity, it is nearly silent. But, when you send the unit a new printing job, it restarts almost immediately.

* The LCD display is smaller than the C3200n''s, and it''s located on the right top (front) rather than on the front itself, so location in your working space might be a small issue.

NOTE: Some say the toner cartridges are very expensive, but they are actually cheaper than HP cartridges if you take a close look at the YIELD ratings on both.

Overall, this laser printer does the job for me. It''s fast, it''s a workhorse, and the print quality is first rate. I recommend it highly.

Save 47% off

This is absolutely one of the best printers in its price class. Its print quality in both black and color is head and shoulders above comparable HP printers I should know, the office I spend several days a week in has 2. For plain text, graphics, and CAD, the prints are some of the best I''ve seen.

It is more than fast enough for home office or small business printing, the duplex feature works like a charm, and it is very Mac friendly. Setup via USB or network was easy and fast as usual, don''t use the included CD. I don''t know why manufacturers pack those things with printers anymore. The multipurpose tray is easy to open and stow, and is spring loaded to keep the right tension against the pickup wheels. The whole device is built very well.

One thing to note the thing is huge! Make sure you look at the dimensions and weight, and have a plan for where it is going. Other than that, I would recommend it to anyone who does not need to print photos often.

Lexmark E321 Laser Printer (21S0150)

Lexmark E321 Laser Printer
  • Up to 1,200 dpi image quality, 600 x 600 dpi engine
  • Up to 20 ppm, first page out in 9.5 seconds
  • 150-sheet standard input tray, 100-sheet output
  • USB and parallel interfaces, optional serial and networking
  • 8 MB memory, expandable to 72 MB; PC and Mac compatible

The Lexmark e321 is fast and cheap, but those are the only good things about this diabolically mediocre piece of engineering. It''s unsuitable for high-volume printing because it lacks a large paper capacity, so you''re constantly feeding this thing paper. Worse, if you don''t put the paper in exactly right it grabs three or four sheets at a time and jams up fairly regularly. The text is poor to passable but figures are murky. Personally I don''t think the few bucks you might save are worth all the hassle and inconvenience that come with such a sub-par product. Undying, everlasting hatred does not sum up the extent to which I loathe the Lexmark E321.